When Sage Sankara says Brahman or God is impersonal and attributeless then why to worship God with form, names, and attributes.
Even the Vedas indicate that the Self is consciousness:-
v Tat tvam asi: -Thou art That. The Self is that.” (Sam Veda)
v Prajnanam Brahma: - Consciousness is the ultimate reality. (Rig Veda).
v Ayam Aatma Brahma: -The Self is the ultimate truth. (Atharva Veda).
v Aham Brahma Asmi: -Self is the ultimate reality. (Yajur Veda)
Then why to worship non-Vedic Gods in place of Atman, which is God in truth. Self-realization is the truth- realization. Truth- realization is God-realization, and God-realization itself is real worship.
Lord Krishna says Ch ~V: ~ “Those who know the Self in truth.” The last two words (tattvataha) are usually ignored by pundits, but they make all the difference between the ordinary concept of God and the truth about God.
One must realize the difference between the ordinary concept of God and the truth about God.
The dualistic worship of "God” is only for the ignorant populace. The God in truth is only Atman, the Self. In reality, there is no duality, no differentiation. Only Atman exists.
The Vedas confirm God is Atman (Spirit), the Self.
Yajur Veda – chapter- 32:~ God is Supreme Spirit has no ‘Pratima’ (idol) or material shape. God cannot be seen directly by anyone. God pervades all beings and all directions.
God and Goddess are religious concepts. Whatever seen, known, believed, and experienced as a person within the dualistic illusion (world) is a falsehood.
Remember:~
Sage Sankara’s Supreme Brahman (God in truth) is impersonal, Nirguna (without Gunas or attributes), Nirakara (formless), Nirvisesha (without special characteristics), immutable, eternal and Akarta (non-agent). It is above all needs and desires. It is always the Witnessing Subject. It can never become an object, as it is beyond the reach of the senses. Brahman is non-dual, one without a second. It has no other beside it. It is destitute of difference, either external or internal. Brahman cannot be described because the description implies a distinction. Brahman cannot be distinguished from any other than it. In Brahman, there is not a distinction between substance and attribute. Awareness constitutes the very essence or the true nature of Brahman, and not just its attributes. The attributeless Brahman of Sage Sankara is impersonal.
All those whose intelligence has been stolen by ignorance believe God as an individual and separate from their own existence.
The Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness, is the ultimate truth of Brahman or God in truth.
Sage Sankara declaration: ~ “Brahman (Soul) is the truth The World is Unreal everything is Truly Brahman (Soul) and nothing else has any value.
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad: ~ Brahman (God) is present in the form of the Athma, and it is indeed Athma itself’. Thus, it refers to formless and attributeless God, which is the Atman (Soul), the innermost ‘Self’ within the false experience. It indicates clearly all the Gods with form and attributes are mere imagination based on the false self. Thus, Atman or Soul, the ‘Self’ is God in truth.
Vedas speak of one God that is the supreme ‘Self’ in i.e. Atman or Soul. Vedas indicate clearly all the Gods with form and attributes are mere imagination based on the false self.
God is neither personal nor impersonal because God is not dualistic. God is ever free from the dualistic limitation of form, time, and space.
From God in truth perspective, the form, time and space are non-existent
You have to draw your attention back every time it turns to worldliness (I) and fix it in the Soul, the Brahman or God in truth. : ~ Santthosh Kumaar

No comments:
Post a Comment